Skip to main content

Does hearing loss come with a price?


Photo by Mark Paton on Unsplash

We know that exercise is important for brain health has the potential to delay, or prevent, all cause-dementia in the general population.

Hearing loss has recently also been identified as an important and potentially modifiable risk factor for dementia.

Are hearing loss and physical activity related to each other?

This study below shows in elderly people that hearing loss is associated with a worse physical activity profile. Is this association or causation? Is hearing loss part of the dementia prodrome and hence is associated with other prodromal features of dementia such as poor motivation, social isolation, lower mood, etc., which lead to less activity? Or is less activity in old age related to a lifetime of less activity and hence a higher risk of dementia and is simply associated with loss of hearing? Does hearing loss impact one's ability to exercise? Does less environmental auditory feedback make it less likely that you go out and exercise? It is well known that hearing loss in the elderly causes people to avoid noisy environments. This is likely to impact physical activity.

Population-based interventions to address hearing loss in adults should be linked to studies to see if improved hearing leads to better physical activity profiles.

We have concerns that older people are not digitally savvy enough or motivated enough to use wearables to monitor activity. Maybe with the miniaturization that is occurring with wearables, it may be possible to put accelerometers into hearing aids and achieve improved hearing and activity monitoring with the same device. Let’s hope someone who is a hearing aid designer reads this.



Pei-Lun et al. Analysis of Hearing Loss and Physical Activity Among US Adults Aged 60-69 Years. JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e215484.

Importance: Hearing loss may be a modifiable factor associated with decreased physical activity in older adults.

Objective: To examine the association of hearing loss with objectively measured physical activity, including moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, light-intensity physical activity, sedentary behavior, and pattern of physical activity (physical activity fragmentation).

Design, setting, and participants: This population-based cross-sectional study used National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data collected in the 2003 to 2004 cycle and analyzed in 2017 to 2020. Participants aged 60 to 69 years with complete audiometry, physical activity, and comorbidity data were included in the analysis. Data analysis was performed from January 2017 to December 2020.

Exposures: Hearing defined by the pure tone average (PTA; range, 0.5-4 kHz) in the better ear, with normal PTA defined as less than 25 dB hearing loss, mild hearing loss defined as PTA 25 to less than 40 dB hearing loss, and moderate or greater hearing loss defined as a PTA greater than or equal to 40 dB hearing loss.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcomes were comprehensive metrics of objectively measured physical activity, including time spent in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, light-intensity physical activity, and sedentary behavior, and physical activity fragmentation. Linear regression was used to model the association between hearing loss and physical activity.

Results: Of the 291 participants (mean [SD] age, 64.53 [2.96] years), 139 (47.8%) were male, 48 (16.5%) had mild hearing loss, and 22 (7.6%) had moderate or greater hearing loss. After adjusting for age, sex, education, race/ethnicity, and comorbidities, hearing loss (vs normal hearing) was significantly associated with less time spent in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity by 5.53 minutes per day (95% CI, -10.15 to -0.90 minutes per day), less time spent in light-intensity physical activity by 28.55 minutes per day (95% CI, -53.07 to -4.02 minutes per day), more time spent in sedentary behaviors by 34.07 minutes per day (95% CI, 8.32 to 59.82 minutes per day), and more fragmented physical activity pattern by 0.38 SD higher in active-to-sedentary transition probability (95% CI, to 0.10 to 0.65). The magnitude of the association of hearing loss (vs normal hearing) with physical activity metrics was equivalent to 7.28 years (95% CI, 3.19 to 11.37 years) of accelerated age for moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, 5.84 years (95% CI, 1.45 to 10.23 years) of accelerated age for light-intensity physical activity, and 10.53 years (95% CI, 2.89 to 18.16 years) of accelerated age for degree of physical activity fragmentation.

Conclusions and relevance: These findings suggest that hearing loss is associated with a worse physical activity profile. Whether interventions to address hearing loss in adults could improve physical activity profiles will require further study.

Conflicts of Interest

MS Research

Twitter

LinkedIn

Medium

Disclaimer: Please note that the opinions expressed here are those of Professor Giovannoni and do not reflect the position of the Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry nor Barts Health NHS Trust.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Are you ready for an EBV vaccine to prevent MS?

"Professor Giovannoni, you tell me that my daughter has a 1 in 40 chance of developing multiple sclerosis and that MS has reached epidemic proportions in parts of the world? Is there anything I can do to reduce her chances of getting MS? Is there anything we can do to stop other people from getting MS?" Although multiple sclerosis (MS) is a complex disease due to the interaction of genetic and environmental factors data on the occurrence of MS at the population level (epidemiology) supports the Epstein Barr Virus (EBV) as being necessary, but not sufficient, for someone to develop MS. In other words, EBV is probably the cause of MS. Of all the putative causative agents that have been proposed to be associated with MS, EBV is the only one where the risk of getting MS if you are EBV negative is close to zero or zero if you limit the analyses to those studies which use a technique called immunofluorescence microscopy as the gold-standard assay to detect anti-EBV antibodies. EBV ...

Smoking: a major preventable MS risk factor

I have been complaining about my low productivity levels since I have gotten back to work after my accident. However, last night with a single one hour webinar we have managed to set-up a new international collaboration to study and address the social determinants of health (SDoH) and their impact on MS. Our focus is going to be on which SDoH can we modify and hence improve the outcome for people with MS (pwMS)? Smoking is one such modifiable factor and needs to be addressed at a (1) population level with policy and legislation, (2) at a local or community level, (3) with the family and (4) at an individual level target the people with MS (pwMS). We know that pwMS who smoke have a worse outcome than people who don’t smoke. The effect of smoking is equivalent to negating the treatment effect of being on an injectable therapy such as interferon beta. Put simply smokers with MS start using a walking stick (EDSS = 6.0) about 6 years earlier than pwMS who don’t smoke. Getting pwMS to stop s...

Corpulence and poverty

Since stating my intention to join the  #BackTo21  campaign to get my BMI back to what it was when I was 21 years of age, I have had several emails and direct messages on social media questioning the wisdom of my intention.  Photo by NeONBRAND on Unsplash It is clear that despite BMI being a relatively poor metric of health there is overwhelming evidence that at a population level it predicts poor health outcomes. Importantly there is new data that indicates the target BMI for the prevention of type 2 diabetes and the metabolic syndrome depends on your ethnicity. For people of South Asian origin, there is a call to reset the BMI cutoff to 23.9, which for most people is within the normal range. At the same time, there is a call to classify obesity as an important social determinant of health. Arnaud Chiolero argues below for using BMI as a socioeconomic indicator. Do you agree? Isn’t it quite amazing that in a previous era corpulence was a sign of affluence, whereas in th...