Skip to main content

#MSPrevention: what can we do about air pollution?

As MS is likely to be a preventable disease we should be doing everything we can to reduce our exposure to modifiable risk factors. Smoking, passive smoking, solvent exposure and air pollution have all been linked to an increased incidence of MS. It has always been argued that air pollution may work by acting as a filter for ultraviolet light and hence increases one's risk of getting MS by reducing UVB exposure, which is important for vitamin D synthesis in the skin. However, I am not sure this is the case as common to all these exposures, including air pollution, is inflammation in the lungs.

The current hypothesis is that inflammation in the lungs changes or alters proteins via a process called post-translational modification, which converts normal proteins in highly immunogenic autoantigens that trigger autoimmune disease. There is good support for the latter hypothesis in rheumatoid arthritis, but to the best of my knowledge outside of animal models, the evidence in MS remains speculative. Saying this who wouldn’t want to breathe clean air if one of the benefits is a lower risk of MS?

The study below from Padua Province in Italy shows quite a strong correlation (r-0.89) between exposure to particulate matter in the air smaller than 2.5 micrometres (PM2.5) and the prevalence of MS. Some epidemiologists say that when you start seeing R-values close to 0.9 it is hard to ignore them and suggest the relationship could be causal. I am not sure about this, but it is clear that we need more interventional studies, to reduce air pollution, and track what happens to MS incidence.

In relation to the issue of air quality, there was a landmark ruling from an inquest in London that linked the tragic death of a nine-year-old girl, Ella Adoo-Kissi-Debrah, who died following an asthma attack 9 years ago to air pollution. Legal pundits have stressed the importance of this case, which will now create the legal precedent for the UK to modify its clean air act. The importance of the latter cannot be ignored as it may lead to a drop in the incidence of many diseases linked to air pollution including MS.

The question we also need to ask ourselves is there anything we can do to address the problem of air pollution in low- and middle-income countries that are all seeing a rise in MS incidence? The infographic below tells you just how big this challenge is in both China and India. Let's hope as we transition from a carbon-energy economy to other cleaner forms of energy we will see this problem improve across the world.


Gavin Giovannoni et al. Air pollution and multiple sclerosis risk. Mult Scler Relat Disord
2021 Feb;48:102797. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2021.102797. Epub 2021 Jan 30.

Arianna et al. Association of Multiple Sclerosis with PM 2.5 levels. Further evidence from the highly polluted area of Padua Province, Italy. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2020 Dec 6;48:102677. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2020.102677. Online ahead of print.

Background: Fifty years of epidemiological survey and intra-regional differences in prevalence suggest that environmental factors may be associated with increased multiple sclerosis (MS) risk in Northern Italy. Based on the findings of a previous study carried out in the highly polluted Padan Plain, we further explored the relationship between PM2.5 levels and MS prevalence by comparing bordering areas characterized by quite different environmental conditions, namely the Municipality of Padua and the special protected zone (SPZ) of the Euganean Hills Regional Park, located 15 km from the City.

Methods: Three territories were identified; 1) the SPZ, extending over an area of 15.096 hectares and having a total population of 23,980 inhabitants, 2) the urban area of Padua, with a total population of 210,440 inhabitants and repeatedly recognized by the European Environmental Agency as one of the most polluted cities of Europe, 3) the Intermediate Zone (IZ), i.e., the area in between the previous two, including part of the urban territories of eight villages adjacent to the SPZ. Demographic and socio-economical data were obtained from official government sources (www.istat.it and www.regione.veneto.it). All Italian MS patients residing in these three areas on December 31, 2018, were registered. PM2.5 concentrations (annual average 1998-2018, μg/m3) were measured by satellite. The correlation between PM2.5 concentrations and MS prevalence was analysed.

Results: MS prevalence was significantly higher in Padua City (265/100.000) compared to both the SPZ of the Euganean Hills Park (160/100,000; p < 0.0001) and the IZ (194.4/100,000). Prevalence strongly associated with the annual average concentration of PM2.5 (r = 0.89 p < 0.00001).

Conclusion: In the Province of Padua, one of the most polluted areas of Europe, MS prevalence is strongly associated with PM2.5 exposure. Our findings suggest that air pollutants may be one of the possible environmental risk factors for MS in the Veneto Region of Italy.

Twitter: @gavinGiovannoni                                              Medium: @gavin_24211

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Are you ready for an EBV vaccine to prevent MS?

"Professor Giovannoni, you tell me that my daughter has a 1 in 40 chance of developing multiple sclerosis and that MS has reached epidemic proportions in parts of the world? Is there anything I can do to reduce her chances of getting MS? Is there anything we can do to stop other people from getting MS?" Although multiple sclerosis (MS) is a complex disease due to the interaction of genetic and environmental factors data on the occurrence of MS at the population level (epidemiology) supports the Epstein Barr Virus (EBV) as being necessary, but not sufficient, for someone to develop MS. In other words, EBV is probably the cause of MS. Of all the putative causative agents that have been proposed to be associated with MS, EBV is the only one where the risk of getting MS if you are EBV negative is close to zero or zero if you limit the analyses to those studies which use a technique called immunofluorescence microscopy as the gold-standard assay to detect anti-EBV antibodies. EBV ...

Smoking: a major preventable MS risk factor

I have been complaining about my low productivity levels since I have gotten back to work after my accident. However, last night with a single one hour webinar we have managed to set-up a new international collaboration to study and address the social determinants of health (SDoH) and their impact on MS. Our focus is going to be on which SDoH can we modify and hence improve the outcome for people with MS (pwMS)? Smoking is one such modifiable factor and needs to be addressed at a (1) population level with policy and legislation, (2) at a local or community level, (3) with the family and (4) at an individual level target the people with MS (pwMS). We know that pwMS who smoke have a worse outcome than people who don’t smoke. The effect of smoking is equivalent to negating the treatment effect of being on an injectable therapy such as interferon beta. Put simply smokers with MS start using a walking stick (EDSS = 6.0) about 6 years earlier than pwMS who don’t smoke. Getting pwMS to stop s...

Corpulence and poverty

Since stating my intention to join the  #BackTo21  campaign to get my BMI back to what it was when I was 21 years of age, I have had several emails and direct messages on social media questioning the wisdom of my intention.  Photo by NeONBRAND on Unsplash It is clear that despite BMI being a relatively poor metric of health there is overwhelming evidence that at a population level it predicts poor health outcomes. Importantly there is new data that indicates the target BMI for the prevention of type 2 diabetes and the metabolic syndrome depends on your ethnicity. For people of South Asian origin, there is a call to reset the BMI cutoff to 23.9, which for most people is within the normal range. At the same time, there is a call to classify obesity as an important social determinant of health. Arnaud Chiolero argues below for using BMI as a socioeconomic indicator. Do you agree? Isn’t it quite amazing that in a previous era corpulence was a sign of affluence, whereas in th...